CyberPD got well underway this week. All over the globe teachers are reading and discussing Dynamic Teaching for Deeper Reading by Vicki Vinton. I began reading this book back in June and wrote about my first impressions here.
I understand Vicki’s frustration with the way reading is being taught. In order to meet the Common Core Content Standards, we have whittled down the process of reading to extracted strategies. These strategies help teachers deal with gaps that tend to follow children through their learning career; however, they deny the full process of reading, the experience as a whole.
I am also reading Disrupting Thinking: Why How We Read Matters by Kylene Beers and Bob Probst. I find the theories in both of these books parallel. The two books profess that we have taken out not only the whole meaning making process from reading instruction, we have also removed the joy.
Joy of reading is the only thing that will create lifelong readers. By moving students through the act of reading without addressing how the text makes them feel, we rob them of the experience of seeing themselves in a book or becoming empathetic with someone who is different.
Vicki Vinton professes that we should shift the focus of reading instruction away from text dependent questions to the actual thinking that the reader does.
If our ultimate goal is truly independence, we need students to do much more thinking that highly scaffolded approaches ask of them…students build their identity and sense of agency as readers when they’re the ones doing the work. (p. 23)
At the end of chapter 2, I have highlighted an entire bulleted list of things to remember when planning for more complex reading and thinking. I paraphrase the list here.
- Reading is an education of the heart.
- Meaning is the purpose of reading.
- Consider how much the author hasn’t said explicitly, problem solve.
- Help students build their identities as readers.
- Every student is more than a level. Consider social-emotional needs as well when recommending books.
- Nothing replaces your own personal judgement about what students need.
As a teacher of gifted students, I find the strict strategy based curriculum does not meet the needs of my students. My students need more from their reading experiences. They do not need to be confined by levels or forced to read material that doesn’t interest them. They rebel against these strict practices. Vicki’s ideas reflect my own philosophy of teaching. I know as I continue to read, I will find more connections and ways to enrich the experiences of reading for my students.
If you have a digital literacy post, please leave a link below.
I connect so deeply with the heart of your post, Margaret. As I am contemplating my return to the classroom w/kindergartners this fall, as you know, it is my greatest desire to see my students discover who they are as readers. I must admit that I am relieved to not face the pressure of state testing w/my students, but instead can focus my efforts more on establishing a community of readers. Fingers crossed I get my TCRWP Library grant!!